Live-action remakes have become very typical within Hollywood and generate constant debates regarding their actual necessity and overall effect. While some of the audiences can truly appreciate the fresh take on beloved classics, others argue that they lack originality and they fail to catch the magic of the originals.
The current backlash that surrounds Disney’s live-action “Snow White” has reignited this conversation, for the film’s reception has been mixed to negative, analytically and at the box office.
Two fellow Florida A&M students shared their viewpoints holding different views to see multiple sides. A second-year business scholar believes remakes as a way for new fans to feel connected to old stories mainly.
“These remakes introduce undergoing tales to more newer generations, in addition to mostly refreshed visuals as well as rather varied casts,” she said. “I loved ‘The Little Mermaid’ remake because it celebrated representation while it was staying true to the heart of the story, even though it did get a lot of blacklash just because her skin color wasn’t accurate, which I disagree with.”
On the contrary, a freshman in the School of Journalism and Graphic Communication argues that live-action remakes represent many cash grabs that constantly fail in their attempts to honor the original films.
“Most of these re-dos aren’t as charming in addition to creative as what made prior ones great,” he stated. “The redo of ‘The Lion King’ really disappointed me; it felt soulless to the cartoon. They should’ve done better.”
The broadcast student suggests studios should largely focus on producing new, original content instead of constantly relying on nostalgia to drive ticket sales.
Even just before its eventual and final release, Disney’s live-action “Snow White” has still faced intense criticism.
There were quite a few controversies surrounding the casting choices, script alterations and the complete departure from customary fairy tale elements, leaving many fans quite skeptical. This movie’s dwindling sales show disapproval, as critics say that it diverted greatly from what helped the 1937 film become an icon.
From a gendered point of view, many reactions do occur. Specifically, these reactions in relation to these remakes tend to vary. A casual poll that was updated showed how
many women watchers savor such versions showing of tougher, more autonomous woman characters.
However, some male viewers feel that the reboots sometimes need changes nobody asked for.
The argument about live-action remakes isn’t actually expected to cease anytime soon. Certain people view them as uninspired as well as lacking heart. Many other people view them as celebrations of those films through a modern lens. Ultimately, audiences will decide with simply their wallets whether these films continue to thrive or whether Hollywood will be forced to explore multiple new original directions.
What do you think? Do live-action remakes evolve the narratives, or do they fully ruin all of the classics that people truly love?