Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Is ‘the body’ considered black literature?

Correspondent

Published: Friday, December 4, 2009

Updated: Friday, December 4, 2009 00:12

buffy the body

Ciera Hall

Buffy “the body” Carruth, a volumptuous video vixen, now has her autobiography on shelves among the works of Marcus Garvey and Malcolm X.


In the African-American Studies section at Border's Bookstore, online or in your own city, it is easy to expect to find literature by Bill Cosby, Cornell West, W.E.B. DuBois, and Marcus Garvey.

But who knew video vixens were in the same category as notable black scholars?

A new addition can be found on these shelves – "Vixen Icon: A Tell-all by Buffie the Body."
Buffie "The Body" Carruth is a popular ‘video vixen' known for her uniquely-sized large rear end, having appeared in a number of music videos, movies and magazine spreads.

The biography chronicles her rise to fame and even includes several nearly nude pictures of herself.

"Me and another co-worker were talking about the same thing just last week," confessed one Border's employee.

"I don't know why it was placed there either. But the corporate office handles cataloging, not the store."

Another Border's employee was also unhappy with the book's placement. He thought it shouldn't have been placed there.

Barbara Kinzer, an employee of Borders' Corporate headquarters, shared that the book's publishers, Triple Crown Publications, determines a book's category for placement in stores. However, it was not specified who would need to be contacted in order to have the book moved to another section of the store.

"This is something made to be glorified, which is why black women do not understand their place in life and how powerful they are," said alum Greg Beacham. "They'll never reach their full potential if this is all they aspire to be – a sex symbol."

"This book should be in the porno section," said Charles Evans, associate dean for the School of Business and Industry. "Her book was cataloged in this section because she is a black female and because of insensitivity to African-American history.

The other authors in this category would be upset at this representation of the value of African American history."

Dr. Evans believes the solution begins with students.

"Borders will move the book given substantial pressure from students and other readers," he said. "But it shouldn't be just students who turn up the heat--it should be everybody, black and white."

For more information on how to remove Carruth's book from the African American Literature section, contact Borders'  Corporate office directly by calling 734-477-1100.
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

9 comments

Your name
Fri Dec 18 2009 11:34
There is a misspelling in the photo caption. The correct spelling is "voluptuous."
Rattlertopia
Wed Dec 16 2009 12:58
It's cataloged and placed properly. Were it not African American Literature, I would happy to call the number ask it to be categorized differently. Malcom X and W.E.B. Du Bois do NOT have a monopoly of African-American thoughts, ideals, struggles, opinions, or anything else that went into this person's book.
Danielle M.
Tue Dec 15 2009 11:44
The primary issue isn't the fact that the book was written, but rather its location in the store NATIONALLY and ONLINE. Re-read the final sentence: "For more information on how to remove Carruth’s book from the African American Literature section..."

This has nothing to do with 'haters' of Buffie.

Your name
Sun Dec 6 2009 13:31
The book should just be added to the autobiography section. She wrote an autobiography and how many writers haven't. Just relocate the book and leave it alone. Remember everyone's right to freedom of speech, and if someone chooses to purchase the book or read it then that's on them. Plenty of others have done much worse. For instance, Superhead. Now Buffy hasn't had as nearly a reputuation as Superhead, however, she has turned her modeling career into a business. Like Katt Williams says though, "Everybody needs haters."
Your name
Sun Dec 6 2009 13:31
The book should just be added to the autobiography section. She wrote an autobiography and how many writers haven't. Just relocate the book and leave it alone. Remember everyone's right to freedom of speech, and if someone chooses to purchase the book or read it then that's on them. Plenty of others have done much worse. For instance, Superhead. Now Buffy hasn't had as nearly a reputuation as Superhead, however, she has turned her modeling career into a business. Like Katt Williams says though, "Everybody needs haters."
AUGJaguarette
Sun Dec 6 2009 00:09
When I think of African-American Studies, I think of the greats such as W.E.B DuBois and Marucs Garvey. African American Literature is a totally different category. Ms. Carruth's book is, in fact, African American Literature. It should be placed along side Karrine Steffans' book, "Confessions of a Video Vixen".
Rattlertopia
Sat Dec 5 2009 08:56
'“This book should be in the porno section,” said Charles Evans, associate dean for the School of Business and Industry. “Her book was cataloged in this section because she is a black female and because of insensitivity to African-American history.'

What an idiotic thing to say. I agree to the point that it is cataloged properly because it is (ostensibly) a memoir or biography of an African American (just like the others you proffer as being 'worthy' of the shelf space.) Her path to fame, aspirations, or raison d'etre are of no odds. As for needing to be "in the porno section"... why is that? Did the dean actually read it and compare it to some pornographic standard? Calling it pornography is a pretty serious allegation (even if Borders doesn't have a 'porno section' per se.) As for being "African-American" subject matter... how is it not? Would W.E.B. Du Bois *not* want to read about the seedier side of contemporary African-American culture as recanted by one of those whom it has itself exploited? Would he be disappointed that she could turn the tables? Are the two really that different? Like it or not, the exploitation and glorification of prurient behavior is endemic to hip-hop. Songs and videos about and featuring booties have and will continue to outsell those about 19th century reverse-bigots. In terms of relevance, I'd say this book is at least (if not more) worthy of it's spot on that shelf than "Dreams of my Father."

Blackscholar
Fri Dec 4 2009 12:26
I would very easily say that books such as "The Body" does not meet any credible standard of what substantive literature encompasses. Unfortunately, books of this genre is nothing more than repetitive literature buffonery that perpetuates a negative stereotype about Black women and Black culture.

The sadest aspect about this written conundrum is that White publishing houses will flock to produce this type of books while reluctant to publish books written by serious Black scholars which meet both qualitative and quantitative standards by any measure.

Finally, it's really amazing that when Blacks present themselves(i.e., print, film, singing, sports, entertainment, etc.) in a 21st century Al Jolson or "Steppin and Fetchin" or "Hotentot Venus", that Whites are so eager to support such endeavors. Until Blacks began to view themselves as the Fathers and Mothers of humanity and act accordingly, every other ethnic group will to continue to see us a nothing more than 21st century slaves (driving expensive cars, donning trendy clothes and diamonds, etc) and continue exploiting us on all levels.

false1
Fri Dec 4 2009 09:25
ummm . . . how many photos does it have? . . . Just curious.






log out